A novel non-invasive and echocardiography-derived method for quantification of right ventricular pressure-volume loops

Manuel J. Richter, Athiththan Yogeswaran, Faeq Husain-Sved, Istvan Vadasc, Zvomimir Rako, Emad Mojajerani, Hossein A. Ghofrani, Robert Naeije, Werner Seeger, Ulrike Herberg, Andreas Rieth, Ryan J. Tedford, Friedrich Grimminger, Henning Gall, Khodr Tello
Justus-Liebig-University Giessen. Kerckhoff Heart, Rheuma and Thoracic Center. Imperial College London. Erasme University Hospital. University of Bonn. Medical University of South Carolina.
Germany, United Kingdom, Belgium and United States

European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 23: 498-507
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab038

Abstract
Aims: We sought to assess the feasibility of constructing right ventricular (RV) pressure-volume (PV) loops solely by echocardiography.
Methods and results: We performed RV conductance and pressure wire (PW) catheterization with simultaneous echocardiography in 35 patients with pulmonary hypertension. To generate echocardiographic PV loops, a reference RV pressure curve was constructed using pooled PW data from the first 20 patients (initial cohort). Individual pressure curves were then generated by adjusting the reference curve according to RV isovolumic and ejection phase duration and estimated RV systolic pressure. The pressure curves were synchronized with echocardiographic volume curves. We validated the reference curve in the remaining 15 patients (validation cohort). Methods were compared with correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. In the initial cohort, echocardiographic and conductance-derived PV loop parameters were significantly correlated {rho = 0.8053 [end-systolic elastance (Ees)], 0.8261 [Ees/arterial elastance (Ea)], and 0.697 (stroke work); all P < 0.001}, with low bias [-0.016 mmHg/mL (Ees), 0.1225 (Ees/Ea), and -39.0 mmHg mL (stroke work)] and acceptable limits of agreement. Echocardiographic and PW-derived Ees were also tightly correlated, with low bias (-0.009 mmHg/mL) and small limits of agreement. Echocardiographic and conductance-derived Ees, Ees/Ea, and stroke work were also tightly correlated in the validation cohort (rho = 0.9014, 0.9812, and 0.9491, respectively; all P < 0.001), with low bias (0.0173 mmHg/mL, 0.0153, and 255.1 mmHg mL, respectively) and acceptable limits.
Conclusion: The novel echocardiographic method is an acceptable alternative to invasively measured PV loops to assess contractility, RV-arterial coupling, and RV myocardial work. Further validation is warranted.

Category
Diagnostic Testing for Pulmonary Vascular Disease. Non-invasive Testing
Diagnostic Testing for Pulmonary Vascular Disease. Invasive Testing
Right Heart Dysfunction Associated with Pulmonary Vascular Disease

Age Focus: Adult Pulmonary Vascular Disease

Fresh or Filed Publication: Filed (PHiled). Greater than 1-2 years since publication

Article Access
Free PDF File or Full Text Article Available Through PubMed or DOI: No

Scroll to Top