The perioperative use of inhaled prostacyclins in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Berend Marcus, Frederik Marynen, Steffen Fieuws, Dieter Van Beersel, Filip Rega, Steffen Rex
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Belgium

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
Can J Anaesth 2023; 70: 1381-1393
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02520-4

Abstract
Purpose: Perioperative pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery. While inhaled prostacyclins (iPGI2s) are an established treatment of chronic PH, data on the efficacy of iPGI2s in perioperative PH are scarce.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, CENTRAL, and the grey literature from inception until April 2021. We included randomized controlled trials investigating the use of iPGI2s in adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with an increased risk of perioperative right ventricle failure. We assessed the efficacy and safety of iPGI2s compared with placebo and other inhaled or intravenous vasodilators with random-effect meta-analyses. The primary outcome was mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP). Secondary outcomes included other hemodynamic parameters and mortality.
Results: Thirteen studies were included, comprising 734 patients. Inhaled prostacyclins significantly decreased MPAP compared with placebo (standardized effect size, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.87; P = 0.01) and to intravenous vasodilators (1.26; 95% CI, 0.03 to 2.49; P = 0.045). Inhaled prostacyclins significantly improved the cardiac index compared with intravenous vasodilators (1.53; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.57; P = 0.004). In contrast, mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in patients treated with iPGI2s vs placebo (-0.39; 95% CI, -0.62 to 0.16; P = 0.001), but higher than in patients treated with intravenous vasodilators (0.81; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.33; P = 0.002). With respect to hemodynamics, iPGI2s had similar effects as other inhaled vasodilators. Mortality was not affected by iPGI2s.
Conclusion: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that iPGI2s improved pulmonary hemodynamics with similar efficacy as other inhaled vasodilators, but caused a significant small decrease in arterial pressure when compared with placebo, indicating spill-over into the systemic circulation. These effects did not affect clinical outcomes.

Category
Class I. Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Congenital Cardiovascular Disease
Medical Therapy. Efficacy or Lack of Efficacy

Age Focus: Pediatric Pulmonary Vascular Disease or Adult Pulmonary Vascular Disease

Fresh or Filed Publication: Filed (PHiled). Greater than 1-2 years since publication

Article Access
Free PDF File or Full Text Article Available Through PubMed or DOI: No

Scroll to Top